Wizards Have to Choose Between Darryn Peterson and AJ Dybantsa at No. 1

The Washington Wizards won the 2026 NBA Draft Lottery. Now they have the hardest decision in basketball.
With four days until the draft, the consensus mock projections have been all over the map. Some have Kansas freshman Darryn Peterson going No. 1. Others have BYU’s AJ Dybantsa as the top pick. A few have even mentioned Duke’s Cameron Boozer as a sleeper.
The Wizards front office under Will Dawkins has done a masterful job keeping the actual decision quiet. Multiple league sources have said the team has been split internally for weeks, with the scouting department leaning one direction and the basketball operations side leaning another.
Let me make the case for Peterson. He is the more skilled offensive player. He averaged 20.4 points per game at Kansas with elite shot creation, a 39 percent three-point clip, and the ability to play on or off the ball. He has the higher offensive ceiling and the cleaner NBA fit for a Wizards team that needs scoring.
Now let me make the case for Dybantsa. He is the more athletic and versatile two-way player. He has more defensive upside, more pure athletic explosion, and the kind of franchise-changing potential that comes around once every few drafts. He is the type of prospect you cannot pass on if you are picking first.
The Wizards should take Dybantsa. The reason is simple. Washington is in the early stages of a multi-year rebuild after going 16-66 last season. They are not picking a player to win games next year. They are picking a player to be the cornerstone for the next decade.
Dybantsa has the higher ceiling. Peterson has the higher floor. When you are a team that just lost 26 of its last 27 games, you swing for the ceiling. The downside of Dybantsa is that he becomes Andrew Wiggins. The downside of Peterson is that he becomes Tyler Herro. Both are useful NBA players, but only one is a franchise centerpiece.
The other angle here is the trade conversation. The Pelicans and the Suns have both been mentioned as teams trying to move into the top of the draft despite not having a pick. Both have salary they would need to send back, which limits what they can actually offer.
The Wizards do not need to trade. They have cap space. They have draft capital from the Bradley Beal era. What they do not have is a star, and the No. 1 pick is the only easy way to get one. Trading down is the wrong move, even if the offer is multiple firsts and young players.
The Cameron Boozer wildcard is also worth mentioning. Boozer has been impressive at Duke and has the bloodlines as the son of Carlos Boozer. Most front offices have him as a top-five pick, but the leap to No. 1 would be a stretch. Boozer is more likely going to the Hornets at No. 4 or the Jazz at No. 3.
For Washington, the decision comes down to upside versus polish. Peterson is more ready to play immediately. Dybantsa needs another year to develop, but the developed version is more valuable. The Wizards have time to wait.
The other top names in this draft include Caleb Wilson from North Carolina, Tre Johnson from Texas, and Nate Ament who has been the biggest mystery in the lottery range. Some teams have Ament as high as No. 6. Others have him in the back half of the lottery. He is the most polarizing prospect in the class.
The Wizards roster around the No. 1 pick is also a question. Bilal Coulibaly is a quality young wing. Alex Sarr has been inconsistent at center. Kyle Kuzma is a tradeable veteran. The team has pieces but no clear direction, which is exactly why the top pick matters so much.
Monday night will tell us everything. The Wizards will make the call at 8 p.m. on ABC, and the next decade of the franchise will turn on that one selection. Pressure is on. Washington fans deserve the right answer.

A longtime sports reporter, Carlos Garcia has written about some of the biggest and most notable athletic events of the last 5 years. He has been credentialed to cover MLS, NBA and MLB games all over the United States. His work has been published on Fox Sports, Bleacher Report, AOL and the Washington Post.
